| Topic sentence |
There should be a barrier limiting our extent of information. This barrier should allow people to have basic information of a wide group of people and some basic knowledge about their government, however, not military strategies or some specific knowledge on one individual |
| Elaboration |
People loose them selves and become insecure from such wide extent of knowledge. People would live in fear thinking that others could track them down or other governments might find out all the military strategies that another country has and tries to take them over. Information needs to be limited or else, the rights of an individual and everyones security will be in danger. |
| Examples/Evidence |
People could track down other people by their address and phone numbers if access to information was not limited. Another example is that people could use the information for bad purposes, such as using information to black mail people or governments. |
| Explanation/Analysis |
If people had access to all the information about every individual, strangers would know a person as if they were their friend and be capable of finding their addresses. This would endanger the security of millions of people around the globe and they would be powerless to stop it. The other example relates with my topic sentence because if governments and companies were being blackmailed, then the entire global community could crash. Nobody would have jobs and everyone will owe debts to one another and the government of the country will have no power to do anything. |
| Link sentence |
These issues would arouse and will happen if our access to information was not limited. Everything will come crashing down and everyone will have to live in fear of each other. This kind of world can only be prevented by limiting our access to information. Information could be useful and is needed, however, it comes with the risk that people might know too much. |
Loading...